Hi,
I've recently taken over maintenance for the "xtable" package, and have set it up on R-Forge. At the moment I'm pondering what the best way is to handle submitted patches. Basically, is it better to: 1) Be non-restrictive regarding committer status, let individuals change the code with minimal pre-commit review, and figure changes can be reviewed before release. 2) Accept patches and basically log them as issues to look at in detail before putting them in. I'd welcome feedback from package authors regarding pros and cons, or a "third way" that's better that either. Either privately or to the list. Thanks, Charlie Charles Roosen, PhD Technical Director Mango Solutions AG T: +41 (0)61 206 92 91 M: +41 (0)79 248 70 71 F: +41 (0) 61 206 92 99 www.mango-solutions.com <http://www.mango-solutions.com> Mango Solutions AG Aeschenvorstadt 36 4051 Basel Switzerland LEGAL NOTICE \ This message is intended for the use of...{{dropped:14}} ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
