Hello, I'm one of the maintainers of the r-sig-ecology list, and I think it would be entirely appropriate to include hydrology within the scope of the list.
There hasn't been much hydrologic discussion, as you noted, but not because we wish to exclude it. Sarah On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Mauricio Zambrano-Bigiarini <mauricio.zambr...@jrc.ec.europa.eu> wrote: > Another possibility could be to use the R-sig-ecology, which seems to be > more related to hydrology: > > "analytical techniques and topics that are appropriate for discussion on > R-sig-ecology are quite broad. For examples of what might be appropriate for > discussion on this list, please see the Environmentrics Task View > (http://cran.r-project.org/web/views/Environmetrics.html)" > (taken from: https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-ecology) > > However, I did a quick search on the archives of 'R-sig-ecology' for the > year 2011, and I could only found one single mail related to hydrology: > > https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-ecology/2011-July/002274.html > > (in the same search I couldn't find any single reference to hydrology in the > R-sig-geo during the year 2011) -- Sarah Goslee http://www.functionaldiversity.org ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
