On 18 September 2012 at 16:50, Spencer Graves wrote: | On August 30, 2012, CRAN maintainers rejected the latest version | of "fda", and I understood them to say it was rejected because the | current CRAN policy did not accept packages reporting either "Notes" or | "Warnings".
That is not what the "CRAN Repository Policy" document says: * Please ensure that R CMD check --as-cran has been run on the tarball to be uploaded before submission. This should be done with the current release of R or (preferably) R-devel or R-patched. As “Writing R Extensions” says Please ensure that you can run through the complete procedure with only warnings that you understand and have reasons not to eliminate. In principle, packages must pass R CMD check without warnings or significant notes to be admitted to the main CRAN package area. If there are warnings or notes you cannot eliminate (for example because you believe them to be spurious) send an explanatory note as part of your covering email. Notr the qualifier "significant" in front of notes, so it is not "all notes" as you imply. Now, if would of course help if CRAN could specify what "significant notes" were ... Dirk -- Dirk Eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel