This seems like a conversation to have with the package's maintainer
(Hadley), as suggested by the posting guide:
http://www.r-project.org/posting-guide.html
"If the question relates to a contributed package , e.g., one downloaded
from CRAN, try contacting the package maintainer first."
and not R-devel.
Regards,
Brian
On 11/04/2013 03:54 AM, Thaler,Thorn,LAUSANNE,Applied Mathematics wrote:
Dear all,
Is there a reason, why there is no +-operator for aes (i.e. uneval) objects (as
there is for themes and gg objects)? I had a couple of cases where such an
operator would be useful, for instance to combine the result of aes and
aes_string in functions. Any flaws with the following proposition:
`+.uneval` <- function(e1, e2) {
dup <- names(e1) %in% names(e2)
if (any(dup)) {
duplist <- paste(sQuote(names(e1)[dup]), collapse = ", ")
msg <- sprintf(ngettext(length(dup),
"element %s occurs in both summands - second one gets
precedence",
"elements %s occur in both summands - second one gets
precedence"),
duplist)
warning(msg, domain = NA)
}
res <- c(e1[!dup], e2)
class(res) <- "uneval"
res
}
Any thoughts on that?
Kind Regards,
Thorn Thaler
NRC Lausanne
Applied Mathematics
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
