On Mar 20, 2014, at 8:19, "Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D." <thern...@mayo.edu> wrote:
> There is a central assertion to this argument that I don't follow: > >> At the end of the day most published results obtained with R just won't be >> reproducible. > > This is a very strong assertion. What is the evidence for it? If I've understood Jeroen correctly, his point might be alternatively phrased as "won't be reproducED" (i.e., end user difficulties, not software availability). Michael ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
