On 03/05/2014 12:39 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
Can anyone tell me what the significance of 1954 is in R's NA?
Just ask R: > 2*(1-pnorm(1954)) [1] 0 > 2*(1-pnorm(1954)) %in% NA [1] 0 > ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
