On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:54 AM, John McKown <john.archie.mck...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Gábor Csárdi <csardi.ga...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> this is a CRAN question, so I am sorry if this is not the appropriate forum. >> >> I noticed that there is at least one CRAN package that has a binary (OSX >> Mavericks) for a version, that does not have any source package on CRAN. Or >> at least I am unable to locate it. The package is Rglpk: >> http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Rglpk/index.html > > I went there and say a source package: > > <quote> > > Downloads: > > Reference manual:Rglpk.pdf > Package source:Rglpk_0.6-0.tar.gz <<<!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! SOURCE !!!!!!!!!!!>>> > Windows binaries:r-devel: Rglpk_0.6-0.zip, r-release: Rglpk_0.6-0.zip, > r-oldrel: Rglpk_0.6-0.zip > OS X Snow Leopard binaries:r-release: Rglpk_0.6-0.tgz, r-oldrel: > Rglpk_0.6-0.tgz > OS X Mavericks binaries:r-release: Rglpk_0.5-2.tgz > Old sources:Rglpk archive > </quote> > > Or: http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Rglpk_0.6-0.tar.gz > >> >> It offers a binary for 0.5-2, but there is no 0.5-2 source package >> anywhere. Is this simply a mistake, or it is OK to have binary-only >> packages on CRAN?
OOPS, I saw the 0.6 package source, not 0.5. My mistake. Why not recompile? Do you require 0.5 for some reason? I would guess that CRAN requires only the _current_ source, not _every_ source. And http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Archive/Rglpk/ only has the source archived for 0.4-1 >> >> Thanks much, Best, >> Gabor -- If you sent twitter messages while exploring, are you on a textpedition? He's about as useful as a wax frying pan. 10 to the 12th power microphones = 1 Megaphone Maranatha! <>< John McKown ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
