If Martin's proposal for declaring non-S3 methods in NAMESPACE is
feasible, it would be very helpful. The packages we support have
multiple examples of unfortunately named functions non-S3 functions, so
creating a route for migrating them into compliance would be great.
best,
-skye
On 06/12/2015 03:00 AM, r-package-devel-requ...@r-project.org wrote:
> Message: 11
> Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 09:55:18 +0200
> From: Martin Maechler<maech...@stat.math.ethz.ch>
> To: John Fox<j...@mcmaster.ca>
> Cc: Michael Friendly<frien...@yorku.ca>, Sandy Weisberg
> <sa...@umn.edu>, r-package-de...@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] "apparent S3 methods" note in R CMD check
> Message-ID:<21882.36966.429889.227...@stat.math.ethz.ch>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
<snip>
> that it would be desirable for the package author to
> effectively declare the fact that such a function is not an S3
> method even though it "looks like it" at least if looked from far.
>
> So, ideally, you could have something like
>
> nonS3method("all.effects")
>
> somewhere in your package source ( in NAMESPACE or R/*.R )
> which would tell the package-checking code -- but*ALSO* all the other S3
> method code that all.effects should be treated as a regular R
> function.
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
