> > Is there a point at which the original developer should not stay on the > > author > list? > > Authorship is not just about code. For example, there are functions in R > which > have been completely recoded, but the design and documentation remain. > Copyright can apply to designs and there is shading between > inspiration and infringement. And many of us believe that inspiration > should be credited as a moral even if not a legal obligation.
"Once an author on CRAN, always an author on CRAN"* doesn't sound a bad maxim to work to. *This statement should be cited** as S L R Ellison, C L Dodgson, 'RE: [Rd] authorship and citation'. r-devel mailing list, 2015 with Acknowledgements: B Ripley, R-Core, S Urbanek for helpful remarks **following its own precepts :) ******************************************************************* This email and any attachments are confidential. Any use, copying or disclosure other than by the intended recipient is unauthorised. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately via +44(0)20 8943 7000 or notify postmas...@lgcgroup.com and delete this message and any copies from your computer and network. LGC Limited. Registered in England 2991879. Registered office: Queens Road, Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 0LY, UK ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
