On 2015-12-31 17:02, Michael Felt wrote:
On 2015-12-31 16:14, Michael Felt wrote:
- literal (&, M-^?) (38, 65535), pos 0, sub -1, 0 tags
+ literal (&, M-^?) (38, -1), pos 0, sub -1, 0 tags
Getting down to these two lines - so I think it is now "before"
Made a few changes - mainly in tre-ast.c
+135 static void
+136 tre_do_print(FILE *stream, tre_ast_node_t *ast, int indent)
+137 {
+138 tre_cint_t code_min, code_max;
+139 size_t pos;
+140 int num_tags = ast->num_tags;
+141 tre_literal_t *lit;
Lines 138 and 139 are now typed to what I 'think' the correct type is:
And, to better see the values:
+182 else
+183 {
+184 fprintf(stream, "literal (%c, %c) (%010x, %010x), pos %d, sub %d, "
+185 "%d tags\n", code_min, code_max, code_min, code_max, pos,
+186 ast->submatch_id, num_tags);
+187 }
changed %d to %010x for code_min and code_max
And the comparison is now shows:
64_bit: literal (&, ▒) (0000000026, 00ffffffff), pos 0, sub -1, 0 tags
32_bit: literal (&, ▒) (0000000026, 000000ffff), pos 0, sub -1, 0 tags
So, if -elsewhere- a test is being made for code_max - there is a
difference. Strings and lists are not my thing. I do hope someone else
has enough to find the 'type dependent' test or constant.
Michael
______________________________________________
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
