>>>>> Peter Haverty <haverty.pe...@gene.com> >>>>> on Mon, 9 May 2016 09:47:48 -0700 writes:
> Dear Kirill, > You are correct, that is a new bug introduced in PR16491. The appropriate > fix and regression tests have been added via PR16885, which has been merged > into trunk. I believe that means the fix will be released with R 3.3.1. Yes, definitely. Kirill, as seem to use code which does trigger the bug, you may want to switch using 'R-patched', i.e., > R.version.string [1] "R version 3.3.0 Patched (2016-05-09 r70591)" ( where the subversion revision must be >= 70591 ) > I checked your example and the second "match" now properly returns 1 with > the patched code. > Please have a look at > https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16885 > http://developer.r-project.org/blosxom.cgi/R-devel/NEWS > Thank you for your report. I hope the benefits of this speedup will > eventually outweigh this unfortunate bug in my PR16491. I'm pretty sure that your hope will be fulfilled. > Regards, > Pete > ____________________ > Peter M. Haverty, Ph.D. Martin Maechler, ETH Zurich ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel