On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 22:46 -0500, Kevin Ushey wrote: > It appears that Unlicense is considered a free and GPL-compatible > license; however, the page does suggest using CC0 instead (which is > indeed a license approved / recognized by CRAN). CC0 appears to be > the primary license recommended by the FSF for software intended for > the public domain.
I'd second the recommendation for CC0. Lawyers at IP-restrictive firms I've worked for in the past have been OK with this license. - Brian ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
