>>>>> Hugh Parsonage writes: > If a function contains the pattern `<-` it is (with a few exceptions) > deemed to be a replacement function and in particular must have second > argument `value` to pass R CMD check.
> Consider the function %<->% or any other function containing <- within > grapes. I claim that such functions should not be considered > replacement functions and thus the R CMD check should not require its > second argument to be `value`. I just committed c76224 which drops %xxx% binops from the list of (probable) replacement functions. Thanks for spotting this! Best -k > Recommend in the function tools::checkReplaceFuns > grep("<-", objects_in_code, > value = TRUE) > be changed to > grep("<-$", objects_in_code, > value = TRUE) > Hugh. > ______________________________________________ > R-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel