Terry, Martin Would this happen to be related to the "indexing term objects" issue that has been bothering you?
-pd > On 5 Aug 2019, at 21:44 , Paul Buerkner <paul.buerk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > update.formula does not seem to correctly update (i.e. remove in my case) > offset terms. > > Here is an example: > > update(~x + offset(z), ~ . - offset(z)) >> ~x + offset(z) > > Also: > update(~x, ~ . - offset(z)) >> ~x + offset(z) > > In both cases, I would expect the result >> ~x > > as - <term> should remove <term> from the formula as happens for instance > in: > > update(~x + z, ~ . - z) >> ~x > > I don't know if this behavior is intentional but I would say it is at least > unfortunate. > > Paul > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel -- Peter Dalgaard, Professor, Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark Phone: (+45)38153501 Office: A 4.23 Email: pd....@cbs.dk Priv: pda...@gmail.com ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel