Would it be good enough to pass it as a formula? Using your definition of foo
foo(~ A -> result) ## result <- ~A foo(~ result <- A) ## ~result <- A On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 4:18 AM Dmitri Popavenko <dmitri.popave...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I am aware this is a parser issue, but is there any possibility to capture > the use of the inverse assignment operator into a formula? > > Something like: > > > foo <- function(x) substitute(x) > > gives: > > > foo(A -> B) > B <- A > > I wonder if there is any possibility whatsoever to signal the use of -> > instead of <- > > Thank you, > Dmitri > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel -- Statistics & Software Consulting GKX Group, GKX Associates Inc. tel: 1-877-GKX-GROUP email: ggrothendieck at gmail.com ______________________________________________ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel