On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Philippe Grosjean wrote: > I propose to move this thread to R-devel... > > Prof. Brian Ripley wrote: > >And are you able to give an explanation? For example, did you compile > >each under the same compiler system? > > I just noticed that behaviour yesterday, and had not much time yet to > investigate it. I compiled 1.7.0 myself (but compared with the binary > provided on CRAN; no changes). I used the 1.7.1 binary provided on CRAN. I > know these binaries are not supported, so we (Windows users) will have to > look at that by ourselve. Indeed yes, I'll first compile 1.7.1 with the same > compiler I used for 1.7.0. > > >I doubt if this is worth R-core's time to pursue, so over to interested > >users to find an explanation and fix. > > OK. But I was wondering if people at R-core team, especially those who > worked on Windows specific aspects, would have in mind some changes they did > between 1.7.0 and 1.7.1 than can cause this. Since these changes are mainly > corrections of bugs, the list is hopefully not so long... and it could help > a lot to have these hints. Thanks very much.
No idea from me, and the effect is not seen on other platforms. -- Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595 ______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
