>>>>> "Duncan" == Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> on Sun, 28 Nov 2004 10:25:24 -0500 writes:
Duncan> <........>
Duncan> <........>
Duncan> We already have code to source() from the clipboard, and it could
Duncan> address the problems above, but:
Duncan> - Source with echo=T doesn't echo, it deparses, so some comments are
Duncan> lost, formatting is changed, etc.
yes, and we would have liked to have an alternative "source()"
for a *very* long time...
Examples where I "hate" the non-echo (i.e. the loss of all
comments and own-intended formatting) is when you use it for
demos, etc, notably in R's own demo() and example() functions.
But to do this might be more tricky than at first thought:
Of course you can readLines() the source file and writeLines()
them to whatever your console is. The slightly difficult thing
is to "see" which junks to ``send to R'' , i.e. to parse() and eval().
The basic problem seems to see when expressions are complete.
Maybe we should / could think about enhancing parse() {or a new
function with extended behavior} such that it would not only
return the parse()d expressions, but also indices (byte or even
line counters) to the source text, indicating where each of the
expression started and ended.
That way I could see a way to proceed.
Martin
Duncan> <........>
Duncan> <........>
______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
