>>>>> "tony" == A J Rossini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> on Tue, 8 Feb 2005 13:33:23 +0100 writes:
tony> For OBVIOUS reasons, is there any chance that we could introduce
tony> "package()" and deprecate "library()"?
This idea is not new {as you must surely have guessed}. In fact,
there's a much longer standing proposition of "usePackage()"
(IIRC, or "use.package()" ?). However, we (R-core) always had
wanted to also provide a ``proper'' class named "package"
along with this, but for several reasons didn't get around to it.. yet.
-- I've diverted to R-devel now that we are really talking about
desired future behavior of R
tony> (well, I'll also ask if we could deprecate "=" for assignment, but
tony> that's hopeless).
:-)
tony> On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 11:49:39 +0100, Martin Maechler
tony> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>>>> "Pavel" == Pavel Khomski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>>>> on Tue, 08 Feb 2005 10:20:03 +0100 writes:
>>
Pavel> this is a question, how can i specify the random part
Pavel> in the GLMM-call (of the lme4 library) for compound
Pavel> matrices just in the the same way as they defined in
Pavel> the lme-Call (of the nlme library).
>>
>> ``twice in such a short paragraph -- yikes !!'' ... I'm getting
>> convulsive...
>>
>> There is NO lme4 library nor an nlme one !
>> There's the lme4 *PACKAGE* and the nlme *PACKAGE* -- please --
>>
>> ....................
______________________________________________
R-devel@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
