chris, as long as you know the log likelihood functions and the # of parameters in both models, a pencil and a piece of paper should be enough to calculate LR test.
On 9/21/07, Chris Elsaesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to try a likelihood ratio test in place of waldtest. > Ideally I'd like to provide two glm models, the second a submodel of the > first, in the style of lrt > (http://www.pik-potsdam.de/~hrust/tools/farismahelp/lrt.html). [lrt > takes farimsa objects] > > Does anyone know of such a likelihood ratio test? > > > Chris Elsaesser, PhD > Principal Scientist, Machine Learning > SPADAC Inc. > 7921 Jones Branch Dr. Suite 600 > McLean, VA 22102 > > 703.371.7301 (m) > 703.637.9421 (o) > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > -- =============================== "I am dying with the help of too many physicians." - Alexander the Great, on his deathbed =============================== WenSui Liu (http://spaces.msn.com/statcompute/blog) ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.