On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, hadley wickham wrote: > On 10/9/07, Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, Alberto Monteiro wrote: >> >>> >>> Prof Brian Ripley wrote: >>>> >>>> Read ?par and the descriptiuon in 'An Introduction to R'. "din", >>>> "fin", "mai", "omi", "pin" and "usr" are relevant. >>>> >>> Is there any hope that, instead of fin, din, pin, etc someday >>> we will have fmm, dmm, pmm? >> >> No. R is quite capable of scaling by 25.4. > > Where did the inches come from? Is it for compatibility with S-plus? > I can't imagine that Ross would have used inches by default.
>From S's precursor GR-Z as I recall, from the 1970s. Note that all the base graphics devices are sized in inches (the pixel ones came later and are Guido's or mine), and most of those are Ross's doing. -- Brian D. Ripley, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595 ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
