Possibly.  I find it difficult to argue the case either way in the
abstract, though.  I think once you see some of the outcomes, it will
become clear which are good enough for posting and which are not.
 
Bill Venables.
 
 
  _____  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ricardo Pietrobon
Sent: Monday, 22 October 2007 2:56 PM
To: Venables, Bill (CMIS, Cleveland)
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [R] Input appreciated: R teaching idea + a way to improve
R-wiki


Bill, very interesting comment.  However, do you believe that by posting
these tutorials on a wiki they could, even if initially faulty, be
improved by the community over time?  

Ricardo




On 10/22/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

        I think you need to see how things work before making any
decision on
        this.  While the principle seems OK, in a optimistic sort of
way, you
        may be a little disappointed by the outcome.  Some will likely
be
        superb, useful, well written and accessible.  Others, I suspect,
will 
        fall short of this ideal, with some falling a fair way short.
That's
        the way students learn, after all.  They should use these
exercises to
        straighten things out in their own minds, and some of them seem
to have 
        rather twisted ideas, at least initially, even at
"graduate-level".
        
        Some people argue it's useful to see the learning process in
action, and
        some books I could mention seem to be written this way - but
they don't 
        get very good reviews.  I just think there is a real danger here
of
        giving misleading and inefficient teaching materials a spurious
cloak of
        legitimacy, even if there are disclaimers all over it.  I see a
need to 
        be very cautious about this, in other words.
        
        
        Bill Venables
        CSIRO Laboratories
        PO Box 120, Cleveland, 4163
        AUSTRALIA
        Office Phone (email preferred): +61 7 3826 7251
        Fax (if absolutely necessary):  +61 7 3826 7304 
        Mobile:                         +61 4 8819 4402
        Home Phone:                     +61 7 3286 7700
        mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        http://www.cmis.csiro.au/bill.venables/
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
        On Behalf Of Matthew Keller
        Sent: Monday, 22 October 2007 9:45 AM
        To: R list
        Subject: [R] Input appreciated: R teaching idea + a way to
improve
        R-wiki
        
        Hi all,
        
        I will be teaching a graduate-level course on R at CU Boulder
next 
        semester. I have a teaching idea that might also help improve
the R
        wiki page... I wanted to know what you all thought of it and
wanted to
        solicit some advice about doing it.
        
        During the latter part of the course, students will choose a
topic of 
        interest (e.g., hierarchical linear modeling), and show how to
achieve
        it in R. They would present their findings to the class, and
would
        also be responsible for writing a concise but well-written "How
To" 
        manual on the topic. These would be ~ 5-10 pages and would
include
        basic background of the statistical procedure and a commented
example
        with code in R. The goal would be for these to read like Baron &
Li's 
        "Notes on the use of R for psychology experiments and
questionnaires."
        
        Originally I was going to post these as PDFs on my own web-page
and
        let them grow into a compendium of how-to manuals as I teach
this 
        course over the years. However, perhaps a better idea, and one
that
        probably benefits more people, is to have my students post their
short
        manuals (not as PDFs but rather typed in) on the R-wiki page.
        
        Does this seem like a good idea to folks? 
        
        Another question has to do with how barren the current R wiki
page
        is... is it still being actively developed or has the community
given
        up on it?
        
        Finally, any thoughts on where on the R-wiki site we should post
our 
        "How To" manuals? The "tips and tricks" section seems to barely
be
        more than snippets of conversations from this list-serve (often
sans
        the context). My guess is that the "Guides" section is where
these 
        should go.
        
        Your input would be most appreciated. Best,
        
        Matt
        
        
        
        --
        Matthew C Keller
        Asst. Professor of Psychology
        University of Colorado at Boulder
        www.matthewckeller.com
        
        ______________________________________________
        R-help@r-project.org mailing list
        https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help 
        PLEASE do read the posting guide
        http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
        and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible
code.
        
        ______________________________________________
        R-help@r-project.org mailing list
        https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help 
        PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
        and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible
code.
        





        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to