Guilty of what?  What are you trying to compare?  Now all the
approaches do get down to 'loops' being performed in the base level
code (C in this case).  What exactly are you asking?  You can alway
'time' (sys.time) a set of statements to see which is better (just
make sure you execute them enough times to get reasonable readings --
several seconds)

On 10/23/07, Walter Alini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hope this is helpful,
>
> Certainly! Thanks Dan and Jim!
>
> Now, I wonder where I can dig in to realize why this is better. Is C
> code for this function better than others? Is C guilty on this?
>
> Maybe I am too newbie.
>
> Thanks again, guys!
>
> Walter
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>


-- 
Jim Holtman
Cincinnati, OH
+1 513 646 9390

What is the problem you are trying to solve?

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to