Hi,
I am trying to fit a ANCOVA model using lmRob. The P-values of the
variables in the model differ hugely between the summary() function and
the anova() function (from >0.8 in the summary to <0.001in the anova for
the same variable). I understand that with an ANCOVA the order in which
the variables are added to the model matters and that this influences
the P-value, but can this make such a big difference?
Which P-values are best to use? Also, could this be an indication
something is wrong with my model?
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
Geertje
~~~~
Geertje van der Heijden
PhD student
Tropical Ecology
School of Geography
University of Leeds
Leeds LS2 9JT
Tel: (+44)(0)113 3433345
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
