Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > If you write an update.X method where X is the class of your graph > objects then it will work on > your graph objects and yet still work on lm, glm, etc.
One example (for non-model objects) is e.g. the update method for survey design objects (update.survey.design) in the survey package by Thomas Lumley. HTH, Tobias > On Nov 20, 2007 7:01 AM, Søren Højsgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> I wonder if it is "bad style" (or something worse) to create an "update" >> function which does not work on model objects of the lm, glm etc. type. >> Specifically, I have some graph objects (graphs as mathematical objects, not >> as displays) which I want to alter and for that purpose I thought of writing >> an update function. Would doing so violate a "deeper philosophy" in the R >> system or have other unfortunate consequences. If so, I'm happy to hear >> other suggestions... >> >> Regards >> Søren -- Tobias Verbeke - Consultant Business & Decision Benelux Rue de la révolution 8 1000 Brussels - BELGIUM +32 499 36 33 15 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
