Hi R users!
I've come across using kpss tests for time series analysis and i have a
question that troubles me since i don't have much experience with time series
and the mathematical part underlining it.
x<-c(253, 252, 275, 275, 272, 254, 272, 252, 249, 300, 244,
258, 255, 285, 301, 278, 279, 304, 275, 276, 313, 292, 302,
322, 281, 298, 305, 295, 286, 327, 286, 270, 289, 293, 287,
267, 267, 288, 304, 273, 264, 254, 263, 265, 278)
x <- ts(x, frequency = 12)
library (urca)
library (uroot)
library (tseries)
Now, doing an ur.kpss test (mu, lag=3) i cannot reject the null hypothesis of
level stationarity.
Doing a kpss.test (mu, lag=1 by default ) the p value becomes smaller than 0.05
thus rejecting the null of stationarity. Same with KPSS.test (lag=1)
So, as i have noticed that increasing the number of lags on each of the tests
rejecting the null becomes harder and harder. I saw that books always cite use
of Bartlett window but the lags determination is left to the analyst. My
question: which is the "proper" number of lags, so i don't make any false
statements on the data?
Thank you and have a great day!
---------------------------------
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
