On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 17:31 +0200, Sergey Goriatchev wrote: > Hello, everyone > > F# is now public. Compiled code should run faster than R. > > Anyone has opinion on F# vs. R? Just curious > > Best, > S
Sergey, F# is public, but is not open source. F# run in windows but run in AIX, linux, MAC, UNIX etc? Compiled code should run faster than R, but is precise? Compiled code should run faster than R, but is reliable? Compiled code should run faster than R, but have 2.440 packages for extend your capacities? Compiled code should run faster than R, but critical code is in C o FORTRAN So I think the F# is not a good alternative, if your concern is velocity dou you look Littler http://code.google.com/p/littler/ -- Bernardo Rangel Tura, M.D,MPH,Ph.D National Institute of Cardiology Brazil ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
