<!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1107304683 0 0 159 0;} @font-face
{font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0;
mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable;
mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1073750139 0 0 159 0;} /* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-unhide:no;
mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; margin-top:0cm;
margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:10.0pt; margin-left:0cm;
line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
.MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; mso-default-props:yes;
font-size:10.0pt; mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt;
mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;} @page
Section1 {size:595.3pt 841.9pt; margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;
mso-header-margin:35.4pt; mso-footer-margin:35.4pt;
mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} --> Hi all, Im a
psychologist moving from anova to lmer for analysis of response time (and error
data) from a reaction time experiment, and have a question about specifying the
structure of random effects in the model. Many of the examples I am reading
about involve split-plot designs where effects are nested within each other
.... This is not the case here: I am using a typical repeated measures design
where each subject does everything: 30 subjects judge the laterality of a hand
shown on a computer screen, completing 18 trials in all combinations of the
following experimental factors (Angle, 8 levels (hand shown in 8 different
orientations), Laterality, 2 levels (both right and left hands shown),
Condition, 3 levels (participant holds own hands in posture a,b or c). With
repeated measures ANOVA the Error structure is specified as follows
aov(percentErrors~angle*condition*laterality+Error(subject/(angle*condition*laterality)),data=errorData)
aov(meanRT~angle*condition*laterality+Error(subject/(angle*condition*laterality)),data=RTdata)
where response variables, percentErrors and meanRT, are the percentage of
errors (out of 18 trials) and the mean reaction time over 18 trials I need
to move to lmer as variance is not constant across Angle and error data are
bounded (0,1) so I should use the binomial family my first pass (looking at
all main effects & possible interactions) is:
lmer(cbind(numErrors,numCorrect)~angle*condition*laterality+(angle*condition*laterality|subject),family=binomial),data=errorData)
where numErrors+numCorrect = 18 for each subject &
Angle-Laterality-Condition combination
lmer(meanRT~angle*condition*laterality+(angle*condition*laterality|subject),data=RTdata)
I am unsure if this is correct? Help is welcome, thanks - Nuala
Nuala Brady
School of Psychology
University College Dublin
Belfield, D4
IRELAND
+353 (0)1 716 8247
nuala.br...@ucd.ie
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
