G'day Bill,
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:34:27 +1100
<bill.venab...@csiro.au> wrote:
[...]
> It is no surprise that this does not work when working in the real
> domain, except "by fluke" with something like
>
> > -4^(1/3)
> [1] -1.587401
> >
>
> where the precedence of the operators is not what you might expect.
> Now that could be considered a bug, since apparently
>
> > -4^(1/2)
> [1] -2
>
> which comes as rather a surprise!
[...]
Mate, you must have been using Excel (or bc) too much recently if this
takes you by surprise. :)
This is exactly the behaviour that I would expect as I was always
taught that exponentiation was the operator with the highest priority.
The discussion at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations
points out that "there exist differing conventions concerning the unary
operator -" but gives only Excel and bc as examples of
programs/languages who give the unary operator the higher precedence.
Moreover,
http://www.burns-stat.com/pages/Tutor/spreadsheet_addiction.html
points out that in Excel "the precedence of unary minus is different
than many other languages (including VBA which is often used with
Excel)".
Cheers,
Berwin
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
