Presumably the null hypothesis is that at least one of the differences
is larger in absolute magnitude than the chosen epsilon. I expect that
your procedure would be conservative: if it rejects the null
hypothesis, then you are ok, but presumably what you really want would
be based on a joint confidence region for all the proportions.
albyn
Quoting ?ukasz R?c?awowicz <lukasz.reclawow...@gmail.com>:
Hi, I've got one silly question for evening.
I don't know is this reasonable, but can test with two the most extreme
proportions from the samples could be good enough evidence for testing
equivalence, or should I have to look for something else...?
--
Mi³ego dnia
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
