On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Rolf Turner <rolf.tur...@xtra.co.nz> wrote: > On 03/06/11 11:33, Joshua Wiley wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Nipesh Bajaj<bajaj141...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> I editied the help page for fn1() function (as I already communicated >>> in previous mail) as follows: >>> \name{fn1} >>> \alias{fn1} >>> >>> \title{ >>> A function. >>> } >>> >>> \description{ >>> A function. >>> } >>> >>> \usage{ >>> A function. >> >> What makes you think this qualifies as "editing"? Please read the >> Writing R Extensions manual thoroughly. If you had, you would see >> that what you have written will clearly not work (though I would think >> this intuitively obvious if you have ever read documentation for >> R...what function is simply documented, "A function."?). > > <SNIP> > > Huh? What on earth are you on about? This is just a toy example > to get things working and in such instances a title such as ``A > function'' > is perfectly acceptable.
Really? R CMD check screams bloody murder at me: Bad \usage lines found in documentation object 'fn1': A function. Functions with \usage entries need to have the appropriate \alias entries, and all their arguments documented. The \usage entries must correspond to syntactically valid R code. See the chapter 'Writing R documentation files' in the 'Writing R Extensions' manual. > > It looks to me like the OP's editing was done adequately, and is *not* > the source of the OP's problems. > > Sarah Goslee has already pointed out what at least one of the sources > of his problems is. > > cheers, > > Rolf Turner -- Joshua Wiley Ph.D. Student, Health Psychology University of California, Los Angeles http://www.joshuawiley.com/ ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.