Just wondering here -- I tested and found to my delight that
% round(325.4,-2)
[1] 300
gave me exactly what I would have expected (and wanted). Since it's not
explicitly mentioned in the documentation that negative 'digits' is
allowed, I just wanted to ask whether this behavior is intentional or a
happy turn of events. I'm always paranoid that something not explicitly
documented might disappear in future revisons.
thanks
Carl
--
-----
Sent from my Cray XK6
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
