On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:37 AM, peter dalgaard <pda...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Oct 20, 2011, at 16:50 , David Winsemius wrote:
>
> > That does seem to be an infelicity that ought to be fixed. Using the
> infix addition operator does that same sort of coercions, so why would one
> expect the infix multiplication operator to refuse to do it?
> >
> > > (sum(1000:1205))*(sum(1000:1204) +1205)
> > [1] 51581223225
>
> The addition operator doesn't either:
>
> > (sum(1000:1205))*(sum(1000:1204) +1205L)
> [1] NA
> Warning message:
> In (sum(1000:1205)) * (sum(1000:1204) + 1205L) :
> NAs produced by integer overflow
>
> Beware that 1:1 is integer but 1 is not.
>
Exactly. In order to prevent calculations from overflow, "as.real(...)" may
be used for manual coercion (sometimes the machine is not that intelligent
to do automatic coercing) or users can check the type of constants/variables
as follows:
> typeof(1)
[1] "double"
> typeof(sum(1:100))
[1] "integer"
> --
> Peter Dalgaard, Professor
> Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School
> Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
> Phone: (+45)38153501
> Email: pd....@cbs.dk Priv: pda...@gmail.com
>
>
--
Lei Jiang
Center for Computation and Technology/
Department of Computer Science
Louisiana State University
E-mail: lji...@cct.lsu.edu
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
