true, why it has to omit "treat 7-group 2"....
Thanks again
________________________________
From: David Winsemius <dwinsem...@comcast.net>
Cc: "r-help@r-project.org" <r-help@r-project.org>
Sent: Monday, November 7, 2011 10:19 PM
Subject: Re: [R] why NA coefficients
On Nov 7, 2011, at 10:07 PM, array chip wrote:
> Thanks David. The only category that has no cases is "treat 1-group 2":
>
> > with(test,table(treat,group))
> group
> treat 1 2
> 1 8 0
> 2 1 5
> 3 5 5
> 4 7 3
> 5 7 4
> 6 3 3
> 7 8 2
>
> But why the coefficient for "treat 7-group 2" is not estimable?
Well, it had to omit one of them didn't it?
(But I don't know why that level was chosen.)
--David.
>
> Thanks
>
> John
>
>
> From: David Winsemius <dwinsem...@comcast.net>
> Cc: "r-help@r-project.org" <r-help@r-project.org>
> Sent: Monday, November 7, 2011 5:13 PM
> Subject: Re: [R] why NA coefficients
>
>
> On Nov 7, 2011, at 7:33 PM, array chip wrote:
>
> > Hi, I am trying to run ANOVA with an interaction term on 2 factors (treat
> > has 7 levels, group has 2 levels). I found the coefficient for the last
> > interaction term is always 0, see attached dataset and the code below:
> >
> >> test<-read.table("test.txt",sep='\t',header=T,row.names=NULL)
> >> lm(y~factor(treat)*factor(group),test)
> >
> > Call:
> > lm(formula = y ~ factor(treat) * factor(group), data = test)
> >
> > Coefficients:
> > (Intercept) factor(treat)2
> >factor(treat)3
> > 0.429244 0.499982
> > 0.352971
> > factor(treat)4 factor(treat)5
> >factor(treat)6
> > -0.204752 0.142042
> > 0.044155
> > factor(treat)7 factor(group)2
> >factor(treat)2:factor(group)2
> > -0.007775 -0.337907
> > -0.208734
> > factor(treat)3:factor(group)2 factor(treat)4:factor(group)2
> > factor(treat)5:factor(group)2
> > -0.195138 0.800029
> > 0.227514
> > factor(treat)6:factor(group)2 factor(treat)7:factor(group)2
> > 0.331548 NA
> >
> >
> > I guess this is due to model matrix being singular or collinearity among
> > the matrix columns? But I can't figure out how the matrix is singular in
> > this case? Can someone show me why this is the case?
>
> Because you have no cases in one of the crossed categories.
>
> --David Winsemius, MD
> West Hartford, CT
>
>
>
David Winsemius, MD
West Hartford, CT
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
