Thank you both Bert and David, for the quick reply.
I will look further into this.

With regards,
Tal

----------------Contact
Details:-------------------------------------------------------
Contact me: tal.gal...@gmail.com |  972-52-7275845
Read me: www.talgalili.com (Hebrew) | www.biostatistics.co.il (Hebrew) |
www.r-statistics.com (English)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Bert Gunter <gunter.ber...@gene.com> wrote:

> Maybe should have explicitly said:
>
> > C(ordered(1:5))
> [1] 1 2 3 4 5
> attr(,"contrasts")
>   ordered
> contr.poly
> Levels: 1 < 2 < 3 < 4 < 5
>
> -- Bert
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Bert Gunter <bgun...@gene.com> wrote:
> > ?ordered
> > ?C
> > ?contr.poly
> >
> > If you don't know what polynomial contrasts are, consult any good
> > linear models text. MASS has a good, though a bit terse, section on
> > this.
> >
> > -- Bert
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Tal Galili <tal.gal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hello dear all,
> >>
> >> I am unable to understand why when I run the following three lines:
> >>
> >> set.seed(4254)
> >>> a <- data.frame(y = rnorm(40), x=ordered(sample(1:5, 40, T)))
> >>> summary(lm(y ~ x, a))
> >>
> >>
> >> The output I get includes factor levels which are not relevant to what
> I am
> >> actually using:
> >>
> >> Call:
> >>> lm(formula = y ~ x, data = a)
> >>> Residuals:
> >>>     Min      1Q  Median      3Q     Max
> >>> -1.4096 -0.6400 -0.1244  0.5886  2.1891
> >>> Coefficients:
> >>>             Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
> >>> (Intercept) -0.03276    0.15169  -0.216    0.830
> >>> x.L         -0.28968    0.33866  -0.855    0.398
> >>> x.Q         -0.38813    0.33851  -1.147    0.259
> >>> x.C         -0.27183    0.34027  -0.799    0.430
> >>> x^4          0.25993    0.33935   0.766    0.449
> >>> Residual standard error: 0.9564 on 35 degrees of freedom
> >>> Multiple R-squared: 0.08571, Adjusted R-squared: -0.01878
> >>> F-statistic: 0.8202 on 4 and 35 DF,  p-value: 0.5211
> >>
> >>
> >> I am guessing that this is having something to do with the contrast
> matrix
> >> that is used, but this is not clear to me.
> >> Can anyone suggest a good read, or an explanation?
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >>
> >> ----------------Contact
> >> Details:-------------------------------------------------------
> >> Contact me: tal.gal...@gmail.com |  972-52-7275845
> >> Read me: www.talgalili.com (Hebrew) | www.biostatistics.co.il (Hebrew)
> |
> >> www.r-statistics.com (English)
> >>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> >>
> >> ______________________________________________
> >> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
> >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> >> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> >> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Bert Gunter
> > Genentech Nonclinical Biostatistics
> >
> > Internal Contact Info:
> > Phone: 467-7374
> > Website:
> >
> http://pharmadevelopment.roche.com/index/pdb/pdb-functional-groups/pdb-biostatistics/pdb-ncb-home.htm
>
>
>
> --
>
> Bert Gunter
> Genentech Nonclinical Biostatistics
>
> Internal Contact Info:
> Phone: 467-7374
> Website:
>
> http://pharmadevelopment.roche.com/index/pdb/pdb-functional-groups/pdb-biostatistics/pdb-ncb-home.htm
>

        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to