Thank you for the result, I will have a look at the link. Dr. Iasonas Lamprianou Department of Social and Political Sciences University of Cyprus
>________________________________ > From: Tal Galili <tal.gal...@gmail.com> >To: Iasonas Lamprianou <lampria...@yahoo.com> >Cc: "r-help@r-project.org" <r-help@r-project.org> >Sent: Thursday, 12 January 2012, 10:48 >Subject: Re: [R] kruskal wallis post hoc? > > >Hi Iasonas , >This is a stat question and not an R question. >But the general answer is that it could happen :) > > >The R question would have been if their is a Tukey HSD for kruskel.test, the >answer is yes: >http://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/17342/is-there-a-nonparametric-equivalent-of-tukey-hsd > >But if you didn't get any significant result from the pairwise comparison, I >would say that the post hoc correction wouldn't help you (it could be that the >reason for this significance is based on some weird contrast...) > > >Best, >Tal > > > > > > > > >----------------Contact >Details:------------------------------------------------------- >Contact me: tal.gal...@gmail.com | 972-52-7275845 >Read me: www.talgalili.com (Hebrew) | www.biostatistics.co.il (Hebrew) | >www.r-statistics.com (English) >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > >On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Iasonas Lamprianou <lampria...@yahoo.com> >wrote: > >Dear all, >> >>I run a kruskal wallis test and found significant results. Then, I conducted >>all pairwise comparisons and found no significant results. Could anyone >>please give me a hint as to why this happens or redirect me towards a >>specific web page where I can find more info? (I used alpha=5% and made no >>bonferroni or other correction for the pairwise comparisons) >>Thank you >> >> >>Dr. Iasonas Lamprianou >>Department of Social and Political Sciences >>University of Cyprus >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> >> >>______________________________________________ >>R-help@r-project.org mailing list >>https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help >>PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html >>and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. >> >> > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
