Hi Lincoln, Some thoughts: 1) Did you intend to use "cohort" as a factor and not as a numeric? (at least that is what it looks like in your output) 2) Is there a strong correlation between "cohort" and the other explanatory variables you are trying in your model?
----------------Contact Details:------------------------------------------------------- Contact me: tal.gal...@gmail.com | 972-52-7275845 Read me: www.talgalili.com (Hebrew) | www.biostatistics.co.il (Hebrew) | www.r-statistics.com (English) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:28 AM, lincoln <misen...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Tal for answering, > > Anyway I still have no idea on why the binomial GLM is missing the > relationship between the response variable and the explanatory variable > "cohort". > > Is there anyone who might help me to understand this? > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Binomial-GLM-chisq-test-or-tp4608941p4614184.html > Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
