> -----Original Message-----
> Say I have the following data:
>
> a<-data.frame(col1=c(rep("a",5),rep("b",7)),col2=runif(12))
>
> a_aov<-aov(a$col2~a$col1)
>
> summary(aov)
>
>
> Note that there are 5 observations for a and 7 for b, thus is
> unbalanced. What would be the correct way of doing anova for this set?
>
As this is a single factor case, the imbalance doesn't affect the
interpretation. For two-way and higher models, it would affect the
interpretation, and john fox's post (and a very large literature) then applies.
But here, the usual variants and contrast choices will all return the same
p-value, so aov works, as does
anova(lm(col2~col1, data=a)) #note that the 'data' argument also works in aov
S
*******************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential. Any use...{{dropped:8}}
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
