I see that you got other responses while I was composing an answer.
Your 'example.csv' did come through for me, but I still can't
replicate your PM.DIST_flag variable. Specifically, observations
30, 33, 36 and 40 are wrong.
I agree with Rui, that there's something else going on. The data
you've sent can't be the data that yielded the 'flag' variable
or you didn't use the ifelse() function in the way that you've
shown.
I would start with a clean R session and I would use the 'convert
logical to numeric' idea (or keep a logical rather than numeric
flag):
vn <- transform(vn,
my_flag = ( (PM.EXP > 0) & (PM.DIST.TOT != 1) ) * 1 )
It looks as though your PM.DIST.TOT variable is meant to be
integer. If so, you might want to ensure that it is that type.
Otherwise, you might want to use Michael's suggestion of using
abs(... - 1) < 1e-05.
Peter Ehlers
On 2012-08-24 14:56, Jennifer Sabatier wrote:
Hi Michael,
Thanks for letting me know how to post data. I will try to upload it
that way in a second.
I can usually use code to make a reproducible dataset but this time
with the ifelse behaving strangely (perhaps, it's probably me) I
didn't think I could do it easily so I figured I would just put my
data up.
I will check out the R FAQ you mentioned.
Thanks, again,
Jen
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 5:50 PM, R. Michael Weylandt
<michael.weyla...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Jennifer Sabatier
<plessthanpointohf...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Michael,
No, I never use attach(), exactly for the reasons you state. To do
due diligence I did a search of code for the function and it didn't
come up (I would have been shocked because I never us it!).
Now that real data is up, does your suggestion still apply? I am
reading it now.
If you mean the data you sent to Peter, it got scrubbed by the list
servers as well (they are somewhat draconian, but appropriately so in
the long run). The absolute best way to send R data via email (esp on
this list) is to use the dput() function which will create a plain
text representation of your data _exactly_ as R sees it. It's a little
hard for the untrained eye to parse (I can usually get about 90% of
what it all means but there's some stuff with rownames = NA I've never
looked into) but it's perfectly reproducible to a different R session.
Then us having the same data is a simple copy+paste away.
For more on dput() and reproducibility generally, see
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5963269/how-to-make-a-great-r-reproducible-example
It could be the floating point thing (it's hard to say without knowing
how your data was calculated), but Rui seems to think not.
M
Thanks,
Jen
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 5:38 PM, R. Michael Weylandt
<michael.weyla...@gmail.com> wrote:
Off the wall / wild guess, do you use attach() frequently? Not
entirely sure how it would come up, but it tends to make weird errors
like this occur.
M
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Jennifer Sabatier
<plessthanpointohf...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Rui,
Thanks so much for responding but I think with my HTML problem the vn
data you made must not be the same. I tried running your code on the
data (I uploaded a copy) and I got the same thing I had before.
Jen
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Rui Barradas <ruipbarra...@sapo.pt> wrote:
165114 1 0 0 0 0 417313 1 0 3546 1 0 4613 1 0 225460 1 0 6417 1 1 23
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
