On Sep 10, 2012, at 5:59 PM, semperparatus wrote: > I want to change it because I don't want to compare in this instance between > conditions, but I simply want to see the contrast t-statistic between > patient and control at every level of condition (1, 2, and 3). > >> From there I'd like to be able to plot the t-statistic for the contrast > between patient and control at level 1 of conditon, level 2 of condition, > and level 3 of condition, each with error bars. > > In the post I responded to the output gave fixed effect output for > SecA:Fir1, SecB:Fir1, SecC:Fir1, and SecD:Fir1. I'm hoping to get the same > sort of output but for mine it would be Cond1:Patient1, Cond2:Patient1, > Cond3:Patient1.
It does not appear that you have the same situation as was being discussed earlier: Yours was: ' *When I tried using the syntax you used with my model: lmer(H.y. ~ patient*stance*cond +(cond/patient) + (1|subj), data=H), I got this result, which seems to be using condition 1 as a part of the baseline. Any idea how to change that?*' The other was: test <- lmer(Latency ~ (Nuisance1*Nuisance2) + (Sec/Fir) + (1|Subject) + (1|Item), datatotest) He had separated his nuisance parameters from the 2 variables (Sec and Fir) for which he was interested in examining contrasts. PLEASE learn to include context. -- David Winsemius, MD Alameda, CA, USA ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
