Dear all

I have written a function in C++  , equil_distC, that I am calling from an R 
script.

In the last few days, R has repeatedly crashed when calling this function, or 
delivered obviously wrong outputs. However, when I restarted R after the crash, 
the results turned out to be OK most of the time although I had not modified 
the C++ code.

Although the code runs correctly now, I am not sure why it does work right now, 
and didn't just an hour ago.

Let me summarize the main steps I undertook:

* After having modified the script with the C++ code, I compiled it using R CMD 
SHLIB mylatestversion.cpp - no problems occurred then.
* Next, I loaded the dll into R with
dyn.load("C:\\Ccodefortransortmodel\\ mylatestversion.dll")
* Next, I called equil_distC with
testres2 <- .C("equil_distC", as.integer(rowmaxfiets),as.integer(colmaxfiets), 
as.double(nodes), as.integer(links_dist_calc), as.integer(cyclepathsfirstline), 
as.integer(numzones), as.integer(numnodes), as.integer(numlinks), result = 
double(6))
* About half of the time, whenever I had changed the C++ code, the results were 
either nonsensical or R crashed.
* When R did not crash, I unloaded the dll with:
dyn.unload("C:\\Ccodefortransortmodel\\equildistCforodpair_2012_09_20v8.dll")
* Next, I deleted the .dll and the .o of the most recent version, I modified 
the C++ code and I ran the above procedure again.
* In most cases when R crashed, a new run of the procedure above resulted in 
correct results, even though the C++ code was not modified.

I have also noticed that, in several cases, apparently irrelevant changes to 
the code would lead to a crash. This occurred for instance when I replaced %d 
with %f in Rprintf()) - my first conjecture was actually that this was the root 
of the problem, but the code runs correctly now with %f.

My own conjecture is that, some way or another, old versions of equil_distC 
kept on circulating in memory.

For instance, even after a dyn.unload of all previous versions of the dll, 
"is.loaded("equil_distC")" would still lead to a TRUE.

I would like to understand the structural reason for these problems. Again, the 
problem is not the C++ code - it does run correctly now, although it had 
crashed in the previous run.


Best regards



Laurent Franckx, PhD
VITO NV
Boeretang 200, 2400 MOL, Belgium
Tel. + 32 14 33 58 22
Skype: laurent.franckx
laurent.fran...@vito.be







________________________________
 [http://www.vito.be/e-maildisclaimer/bsds.png]  <http://bsds.vito.be>

VITO Disclaimer: http://www.vito.be/e-maildisclaimer

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to