Off-list it was pointed out to me that the trivial solution to this would
look like this:
myfunction2 <- function(x, ...){
mylist <- list(x, ...)
# plenty of "lapply" stuff
do.call(vioplot,mylist)
}
Thanks for everybodies patience,
Joh
Johannes Graumann wrote:
> <posted & mailed>
>
> Thanks for the very appropriate scolding.
>
> Here's my example (based on "?vioplot"):
> mu<-2
> si<-0.6
> bimodal<-c(rnorm(1000,-mu,si),rnorm(1000,mu,si))
> uniform<-runif(2000,-4,4)
> normal<-rnorm(2000,0,3)
> # Working just fine
> myfunction1 <- function(x, ...){vioplot(x,...)}
> myfunction1(bimodal,uniform,normal)
> # What I (believe to) need
> myfunction2 <- function(x, ...){
> mylist <- list(x, ...)
> # plenty of "lapply" stuff
> vioplot(mylist)
> }
> myfunction2(bimodal,uniform,normal)
> --> Error in min(data) : invalid 'type' (list) of argument
>
> I'm at a loss on how to disentangle "mylist" - unlist just gives me one
> big vector back rather than the 3 I want to have back ...
>
> Thanks for your patience, Joh
>
> jim holtman wrote:
>
>> PLEASE do read the posting guide
>> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented,
>> minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>>
>> It is hard to provide a solution if we do not understand the problem
>> to be solved. Sample data would be helpful along with an
>> understanding of what you would expect for output.
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Johannes Graumann
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Johannes Graumann wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > I have a list of vectors and am trying to coerce them into something
>>> > that vioplot will take as groups of data to be plotted independently.
>>> > Can someone nudge me into the right direction?
>>> >
>>> > Thanks, Joh
>>> >
>>> > ______________________________________________
>>> > R-help@r-project.org mailing list
>>> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>>> > PLEASE do read the posting guide
>>> > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented,
>>> > minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>>>
>>> I'll try less impolite and with more info ...
>>>
>>> I'm writing a function that contains this:
>>>
>>> # function(x, ... , morestuff){}
>>>
>>> which is gathered into a list like so:
>>>
>>> # mylist <- list(x, ...)
>>>
>>> down the line I'd like to output all elements from "mylist" in seperate
>>> vioplots in a single coordiante system. Now I have a hell of a time with
>>> that because vioplot does not accept a list as input but only a
>>> succession of vectors ... how can I now force my list into that form so
>>> a can say
>>>
>>> # vioplot(magicfunction(mylist))
>>>
>>> and get a violin plot for each list-member?
>>>
>>> Thanks for any hint,
>>>
>>>
>>> Joh
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________
>>> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>>> PLEASE do read the posting guide
>>> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented,
>>> minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide
> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented,
> minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
