Rolf Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Thu, May 01, 2008 at 06:59:29AM CEST]: > > On 1/05/2008, at 4:40 PM, Johannes Hüsing wrote:
[...] > > > >When you do the following: > > > >for (i in 1:100) { > > summary(rnorm(80))} > > > >what output do you get? > > He'd get nothing at all. > That's the point. > Did you ***try*** your code? > > >And all this output > > ``All this output''! Consisting of the empty set !!! > Hm, I thought this group would be mathematically inclined enough not to single out the empty set as a special case. > >is redirected to your file by sink(), so it works > >as expected. > > That all depends on what you expect, I guess. I upgraded my expectations after keying ?sink and reading. > Most people > would expect to get some output. As Tony expected. > I readily concede that your answer was taking it easier on the beginner than mine. -- Johannes Hüsing There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesale returns of conjecture mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] from such a trifling investment of fact. http://derwisch.wikidot.com (Mark Twain, "Life on the Mississippi") ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.