Hi Petr,

oh, that's really way more easier than the way I did it. Thanks for the hint!

The problem with "no prediction" is that these cases are already coded within the "Prediction" variable.

0 codes "no prediction required" while 1 and 2 codes for different predictions. Therefore, there are no NAs within this variable.

By applying the procedure suggested by you, I would receive 0-coding for both trials with wrong predictions and trials without any predictions.

But probably I can change coding within the Prediction-variable prior to applying your procedure.

Thanks again!

Best,
Jonas





Zitat von PIKAL Petr <petr.pi...@precheza.cz>:

Hi

-----Original Message-----
From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-bounces@r-
project.org] On Behalf Of Jonas Walter
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 2:38 PM
To: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: [R] creating variable that codes for the match/mismatch
between two other variables



Dear all,

I have got two vectors coding for a stimulus presented in the current
trial (mydat$Stimulus) and a prediction in the same trial
(mydat$Prediciton), respectively.
By applying an if-conditional I want to create a new vector that
indicates if there is a match between both vectors in the same trial.
That is, if the prediction equals the stimulus.

When I pick out some trials randomly, I get some trials with no match
(mydat$Stimulus[1] != mydat$Prediction[1]) as well as some trials with
a match (mydat$Stimulus[1] == mydat$Prediction[1]).

However, if I apply the following code, each trial is coded as a match.
Why, what do I wrong?

In some blocks, there was no prediction recorded. Therefore, I want
those trials to be labeled differently [that is, match = 7].

Coding-legend:

1 = match
0 = no match
7 = no prediction recorded

The code:

# create varialbe that codes match/mismatch of prediction vs. stimulus

mydat$match <- 0

for (i in seq_along(1:nrow(mydat))) {
 # if there is a match, mydat$match[i] = 1        if
(mydat$Stimulus[i] == mydat$Prediction[i]) {
                mydat$match = 1
# the next to conditions refer to blocks without prediction recording.
Therefore, the corresponding trials are coded with mydat$match[i] = 7.
} else if (mydat$BlockOrder[i] == 1 & mydat$Block_nr[i] == 1) {
                mydat$match = 7
        } else if (mydat$BlockOrder[i] == 2 & mydat$Block_nr[i] == 4) {
                mydat$match == 7
        }
}

Well, why so complicated?

(mydat$Stimulus == mydat$Prediction)*1

gives you vector of 1 when there is match and 0 when there is no match.

I do not understand your no prediction though. How is no prediction coded? If NA, the resulting vector will have NA in corresponding item too.

Regards
Petr



# The corresponding dataframe structure:

str(mydat)
'data.frame':   9302 obs. of  18 variables:
$ BlockOrder       : int  1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
$ Block_nr         : num  1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
$ Trial_nr         : int  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ...
$ PreSeq.Length    : int  1 2 2 1 1 2 0 2 2 2 ...
$ PreSeq           : int  21 12 21 20 20 12 0 21 22 11 ...
$ Sequence         : int  121111 121212 121111 121111 112212 121221
121111 121111 122112 121111 ...
$ Category         : int  2 1 3 2 1 1 3 3 1 3 ...
$ FixCross.Latency : int  1429 1043 1093 1297 1155 1449 1140 1396 1341
1427 ...
$ Stimulus         : int  2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 ...
$ RT               : int  333 275 378 428 442 388 340 394 414 542 ...
$ RT.Button_pressed: int  2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 ...
$ RT.Accuracy      : int  1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
$ Prediction       : int  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...
$ Confidence       : int  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...
$ ITI              : int  1053 1182 1467 1431 1103 1170 1232 1393 1356
1495 ...
$ Subject          : num  4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 ...
$ ITruns           : num  0 0 0 1 0 1 2 3 0 0 ...
$ match            : num  1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...

# mydat$match, the new variable, only contains ones.

min(mydat$match)
[1] 1
> max(mydat$match)
[1] 1

# example: row 1699: no match Stimulus - Prediction

mydat$Stimulus[1699] == mydat$Prediction[1699] # [1] FALSE

# but:

mydat$match[1699]
# [1] 1

How can I get the right coding? Where is the mistake?

Thanks!

Best,
Jonas Walter


        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-
guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to