> 
> My concern is with the reported proportions of variance for the 3 
> components after varimax rotation. It looks like each of my 3 components 
> explains 1/15 of the total variance, summing to a cumulative proportion 
> of 20% of variance explained. But those 3 components I retained should 
> now be the only components in the analysis, so they should be able to 
> account for 100% of the explained variance.
Am I misreading what you just wrote? One percentage (20%) is a proportion of 
the total variance in the data; the other is the proportion of the variance 
explained by the model. These are different things; they should not usually be 
the same.

*******************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential. Any use...{{dropped:8}}

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to