many thanks for the enlightenment - I guess I completely misunderstood the
na.rm option here...
On 18 June 2013 00:50, Gabor Grothendieck <ggrothendi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Katharina May
> <may.kathar...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Dear R Users,
> >
> > I've got a strange problem, which I do not really understand:
> >
> > when I use na.spline from the zoo package, the option na.rm is just being
> > ignored, see this adjusted example from the na.spline help page:
> > ########################
> > d0 <- as.Date("2000-01-01")
> > z <- zoo(c(NA, 11, 13, NA, 15, NA), d0 + 1:6)
> > na.spline(z)
> > na.spline(z, na.rm = FALSE)
> > na.spline(z, na.rm = T)
> > #######################
> >
> > In all 3 cases, the output looks like this with the trailing NA being
> > replaced:
> > 2000-01-02 2000-01-03 2000-01-04 2000-01-05 2000-01-06 2000-01-07
> > 8.333333 11.000000 13.000000 14.333333 15.000000 15.000000
> >
> > Am I missing something here?
> > Any help is very much appreciated...
> >
>
> If the result of the spline interpolation still results in NAs then
> na.rm=TRUE will remove any leading NAs. It may be that all currently
> supported methods produce no NAs in which case this argument would
> only be there for compatability with na.approx and in case future
> additional spline methods do produce NAs.
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
