On Oct 24, 2013, at 3:56 PM, Hurr wrote: > Thanks David, did I use incorrect english to call "e" a > formula or function?
Incorrect R terminology. A function in R is a specific sort of object and a formula is a different sort of object. R terminology for the use of "labels = 1/xvalue" inside the arguments to a function may be something along the lines of "assignment in a pairlist". I was rather loosely calling it an "expression". > Seems to me an obvious first try would be to place the labels where > they would have been placed without the formula. And as I said in the context you have failed to include was that R does not "rememeber" or "store" the locations "where where they would have been placed without the formula." It doesn't have access to the arguments used in the prior plot call. > I haven't yet, but I will study from your suggestions. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/labeling-abscissa-using-a-function-of-the-plotted-scale-tp4678075p4679004.html > Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Nabble is not R-help. Please read the Posting Guide that Nabble suppresses in its effort to masquerade as Rhelp. This should have appeared at the bottom of every posting were it not for Nabble suppressing it: R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. -- David Winsemius Alameda, CA, USA ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
