On Feb 8, 2014, at 12:28 PM, David Parkhurst wrote: > I have a situation in which I want to plot a variable Y against X, and then > to add a loess line to that plot. My X variable is 366 elements long, and > about 1/3 are NA's, scattered through the list. None of the corresponding > Y's are NA's. Everything I’ve tried so far, by mimicking examples from four > different books, produces a messy scramble of lines when I try to plot the > loess curve. How can I deal with this situation?
Why not remove rows with NA. If you think otherwise, then tell us where you think we should plot the tuples c(NA, Y_i). -- David Winsemius Alameda, CA, USA ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
