Hi Boris, yes I tried this way and it worked. The fact is that I wanted to be compliant with the old code, I did not want to change anything. So I wanted to find a new way to rewrite the code. Thanks
~ Francesco Brundu On 19 April 2014 23:18, Boris Steipe <boris.ste...@utoronto.ca> wrote: > Have you looked at ?rainbow ? > Is there a reason why you don't simply leave the gamma parameter away? > > Try: > pie(rep(1,100), col=rainbow(100, s = 1.0, v = 0.75, start = 0.0, end = > 0.75)) > > Cheers, > B. > > > On 2014-04-19, at 6:05 AM, Francesco Brundu wrote: > > > Hi all, > > I am using an old code (probably written for R 2.5) and it stops when > > calling rainbow() with gamma argument. I saw that gamma argument is not > > present in newer version of R rainbow function. How can I translate this > > line of code: > > > > rainbow(100, s = 1.0, v = 0.75, start = 0.0, end = 0.75, gamma = 1.5) > > > > ? > > > > It fails with: > > > > Error in rainbow(100, s = 1, v = 0.75, start = 0, end = 0.75, gamma = > 1.5) > > : > > unused argument (gamma = 1.5) > > Calls: nmfconsensus ... matrix.abs.plot -> image -> image.default -> > rainbow > > Execution halted > > > > Thanks > > > > ~ Francesco Brundu > > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > > > ______________________________________________ > > R-help@r-project.org mailing list > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > > PLEASE do read the posting guide > http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
