Hi Simon, Thanks for getting back to me. Would the opposite be true as well then? I have other models where I don't get a warning message at the end of the model fitting but the $converged slow indicates a 'FALSE'.
Thank you ~Trevor On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:07 AM, Simon Wood <s.w...@bath.ac.uk> wrote: > I think it didn't converge. The warning message is for the whole fitting > iteration, whereas mod07.3.BASE.bam5.1$converged indicates whether > smoothing parameter selection converged at the final step of the iteration. > > best, > Simon > > > On 17/06/14 19:10, Trevor Davies wrote: > >> I'm running some spatial GAMs and am using the bam call (negbin family) >> and >> am getting conflicting information on whether the model is converging or >> not. When the model completes its run, I get a warning message that the >> model did not converge. When I look at the object itself, I'm told that >> it >> did. See below. >> >> Warning message: >> In bgam.fit(G, mf, chunk.size, gp, scale, gamma, method = method, : >> algorithm did not converge >> >> mod07.3.BASE.bam5.1$converged >>> >> [1] TRUE >> >> Am I missing something? >> Thank you, >> Trevor >> >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> >> ______________________________________________ >> R-help@r-project.org mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help >> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/ >> posting-guide.html >> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. >> >> > > -- > Simon Wood, Mathematical Science, University of Bath BA2 7AY UK > +44 (0)1225 386603 http://people.bath.ac.uk/sw283 > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
