On Sunday, September 7, 2014 5:47 PM, peter dalgaard <pda...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> On 06 Sep 2014, at 12:24 , bonsxanco <bonsxa...@yahoo.com> wrote: 
> 
> >> 
> >> 1) 8th grade algebra tells me B2/B1 == 0 <==> B2 =0; 
> > 
> > EViews (econometrics program) doesn't have the same opinion: 
> > 
> > Wald test on my real model (edited): 
> > 
> > * H0: B3/B2 = 0 -> F-stat = 37.82497 
> > * H0: B3 = 0    -> F-stat = 16.31689 
> 
> 
> And when the econometrics program contradicts what you learned in 8th grade, 
> surely the latter is wrong and the former is right, because it is done by a 
> computer and computers cannot be wrong? ;-) 
I simply thought that there was a "standard" way to do this: EViews and Stata 
both give the exact same F statistic for my original problem. Given that these 
programs were not developed by the same author (AFAIK), there is some specific 
way to reformulate the restriction which make EViews and Stata give the same 
answer.

______________________________________________
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

Reply via email to